Indefinite social media hiatus

March 9, 2012 — 19 Comments

I decided late last night to move forward with something I probably should have done long ago: an indefinite social media hiatus.

I recently deleted Facebook, Twitter, RSS, and Flipboard from my phone, and have been very happy with the result. Today, I am deactivating my Facebook and Twitter accounts. This is not a decision motivated by Lent, and I have no idea at this moment when or if I will reactivate them. It’s not even primarily motivated by my pressing need to complete my PhD.

My purpose in writing this post is not to say that anyone else should do the same, but I do want to share my reasons in case there is a concern below that you have not considered.

Time and attention

Time and attention are scarce resources. You only have 24 hours in the day. And each hour only counts if you have the attention to be present (mentally, emotionally, spiritually, physically) during it.

It’s obvious that the time aspect of social media can be a problem, but that’s not my major issue—I don’t spend much time checking social media websites. It’s the attention angle that haunts me.

For the sake of argument, let’s assume I have 10 “units” of attention every day to invest in hard thinking (reading, solving hard problems, etc). Once I use these up, I start losing the ability to concentrate, feel mentally drained, and need to recoup.

If I spend 2 of these 10 units filtering signal from noise in rapid-fire social media updates, mining them for good content and engaging in interesting follow-up reading, I now only have 8 units remaining for: my work, probing conversations, reading challenging books, writing, or studying the Bible.

I already operate in a deficit regarding these higher priority activities—I don’t have any bandwidth to spare.

On a related note, the nature of content delivery in social media may be generally altering our capacity for prolonged concentration. We simply don’t know if our current habits will reap disastrous changes in our cognitive abilities and collective intelligence. On this topic, I point you to Nicolas Carr’s book The Shallows: What the Internet is Doing to Our Brains.

Do you use Facebook or does Facebook use you?

Uncritical use of social media is dangerous and irresponsible. Its acceptance is growing at an unprecedented rate. Who is thinking about the implications of these tools? If you have not critically considered their implications in your life, you are not using the tools—the tools are using you.

Just one example for now: Facebook, Twitter, Google, and every other web company is exactly that: a company trying to monetize your use and relationships. You can’t be ambivalent towards this bias.

I really can’t go into this fully but I would point you to Douglas Rushkoff’s excellent book Program or Be Programmed: Ten Commands for a Digital Age.

Addiction

It’s difficult to assess how benign or malignant the impact of various technologies are while you are a user and these sites are open in a tab of your browser. You need distance to discern these things. What I can say is I’m uncomfortable with the draw I feel to check what’s new.

Paul Graham’s excellent essay The Acceleration of Addictiveness is instructive here:

The world is more addictive than it was 40 years ago. And [...] the world will get more addictive in the next 40 years than it did in the last 40. [...] More things we like will mean more things we have to be careful about.

Most people won’t, unfortunately. Which means that as the world becomes more addictive, the two senses in which one can live a normal life will be driven ever further apart. One sense of “normal” is statistically normal: what everyone else does. The other is the sense we mean when we talk about the normal operating range of a piece of machinery: what works best.

Unless the rate at which social antibodies evolve can increase to match the accelerating rate at which technological progress throws off new addictions, we’ll be increasingly unable to rely on customs to protect us. Unless we want to be canaries in the coal mine of each new addiction—the people whose sad example becomes a lesson to future generations—we’ll have to figure out for ourselves what to avoid and how.

This is part of the reason Christians fast. We voluntarily abstain from food, forms of entertainment, or other activities to assess their prominence in our life and to re-focus our attention on what matters most.

Fear of missing out

Part of what fuels our addiction to social media is the desire to not miss out on anything. We want to see everything interesting. If you didn’t post it on Facebook, it didn’t happen!

I will counter that much of the delight of life is in fleeting moments that can’t be perfectly recalled or automatically captured. We should find comfort in crafting a life so interesting, beautiful and personal to be only experienced by you and close relationships.

The same goes for choosing what content to consume (status updates, photos, articles, books, movies, concerts, etc). Here, I will point you to a wonderful piece by Linda Holmes in NPR about being well-read called The Sad, Beautiful Fact That We’re All Going To Miss Almost Everything:

Surrender is the realization that you do not have time for everything that would be worth the time you invested in it if you had the time, and that this fact doesn’t have to threaten your sense that you are well-read.

Surrender [is] your moment of understanding that you’ll miss most of the music and the dancing and the art and the books and the films that there have ever been and ever will be, and right now, there’s something being performed somewhere in the world that you’re not seeing that you would love.

It’s sad, but it’s also … great, really. Imagine if you’d seen everything good, or if you knew about everything good. Imagine if you really got to all the recordings and books and movies you’re “supposed to see.” Imagine you got through everybody’s list, until everything you hadn’t read didn’t really need reading. That would imply that all the cultural value the world has managed to produce since a glob of primordial ooze first picked up a violin is so tiny and insignificant that a single human being can gobble all of it in one lifetime. That would make us failures.

It’s a depressing thought to weigh the value social media updates against the world’s cultural treasures we’ll never experience.

Impact on real-world relationships

I am concerned that Facebook (in particular) may be negatively impacting my real-world relationships. Thinking through these points will be a major feature of the hiatus. Some possible examples:

Image crafting. Social media gives us the unprecedented ability to amplify our good aspects and censor the things we’d rather downplay. I have met numerous people in real life after first interacting with them online (over long periods of time) to find them markedly different in person than their online persona suggests.

Frequency of in-person visits. Do I call or visit people as often as I did before FB? Since I see occasional photos and updates from my brother- and sister-in-law who live across town, a false sense of connectedness may mean that more time passes before I start feeling like I need to see them face to face.

Social injury. There is a natural correlation in healthy relationships between sharing intimate information and trust. There are things my wife and closest friends get to see and know about me that others don’t—this is because I trust them. If someone “overshares” beyond our mutual level of trust, then a type of violation or social voyeurism occurs. I know something I shouldn’t. During the 25 things meme, I learned a lot of things about people that I can’t imagine them saying to me in real life. Related:

Immodesty. Without going out of my way, I often see photos of people in more intimate clothing or settings than would be appropriate if I were physically present. The boundaries of modesty are eroding. People release intimate details of themselves into a medium where those details can easily become available to strangers. I’m amazed by the photos many people will post online.

Redefining friendship. I have “friended” and been “friended” by many people who I honestly have no intention or capacity for maintaining a relationship with. Would it be healthier for my actual friendships for me to not weaken the meaning of that word by acknowledging acquaintances as “friends”?

Intrusion. Sharing lunch with a friend, laying in bed, playing with my daughter, our church gathering… I feel drawn to check my phone. If you’re honest you probably do too. There are worrisome implications from bringing social media into these sacred environments.

Future privacy concerns. Everyone, myself included, posts photos of our kids. I can’t reliably anticipate how my 3 year old will one day feel about her friends being able to review her entire life since I may have documented it entirely online. I am very interested to see what Leta Armstrong has to say on the matter as she grows up.

On Twitter

I have much fewer social concerns about Twitter, probably because the way I use it is more focused on sharing/reading links than on relationships. I hardly interact with any real-life friends on Twitter (must be something to do with my demographic).

Twitter will be the easiest to give up. I joined Twitter with more professional motivations in mind, but it hasn’t panned out the way I hoped. I am connected to a very fascinating bunch of computer scientists, mathematicians, and scientists… as well as exactly three other actively tweeting structural engineers (my profession). Apart from a handful of very meaningful connections, I am quite displeased with the professional return on my investment in this space.

For a content delivery system, I still prefer RSS.

In the future

Rushkoff argues effectively that, like it or not, the technologies I address in this post are already grafted into our society. They are the reality of our day and age, and cannot be easily undone (nor perhaps should they). So to be clear, I am not arguing that everyone should go and delete their social media accounts.

What I am saying is that when I look at my life as it is now, I am no longer comfortable using them the way I have previously used them. Once I am able to distance myself from these tools and gain insight into their implications for my own life, I may critically re-introduce them at a time where I feel like I can better understand what they mean.

Practical next steps

All of this is in the service of moving forward with greater focus and commitment to the things I want to spend my time on: my wife, my daughter, my church community, spiritual disciplines, completing my PhD, building stronger friendships, etc.

I plan to continue posting on my blog. I view the blog in a markedly different light than social media. It is a creative and professional outlet for me. It encourages deep thinking and writing, the exact type of behavior I want to amplify in my life.

I am completely deactivating my Facebook and Twitter accounts, and keeping all remnants off my phone. If you wish to continue receiving blog updates in the future, I will obviously not be posting links to my Facebook or Twitter accounts any longer, so I invite you to subscribe via RSS or via email newsletter.

I plan to cull (not surrender) RSS. I have an experiment underway to prune it down to the highest possible signal to noise ratio, which I may later blog about depending on how it goes.

Contacting me

Those of you who I have real relationships with already know how to contact me, so this section is somewhat pointless. But for the rest of you, my email address and phone number can be easily located on my website. Please don’t hesitate to contact me in the future.

Articles/books linked from this post

Thanks

If you made it this far, I congratulate you and appreciate your time spent reading my thoughts. I’d love to hear what you think about the various issues I raise above, and hope that together we can feel our way toward a future worth living.

19 responses to Indefinite social media hiatus

  1. I think this is a great experiment man! Great thoughts.

  2. Thanks, Ben! Very well written and terrific thoughts. I have been feeling a tug lately and you’ve effectively clarified many of my cloudy thoughts on this subject.

    With an almost 16 year old son, with whom I’m working feverishly at trying to disciple into life, this is a tremendous help. I am actually planning to have him read this post and write a short paper on it. I suspect that it will also create a great vocabulary list for him in the process as well. :)

    • Ken, I’d recommend he read the Rushkoff book. It’s a pretty quick read. I think you’d really like it as well (maybe to preview so you guys can discuss).

      • Just ordered the paperback for Andrew from Amazon… and, ironically, also ordered the Kindle version for me to read on my iPhone. :)

  3. I’ve really enjoyed following you, and I have to say that I’m disappointed to see you completely pull out of social media. I do understand — I did a Lenten social media fast last year, and it was great for me — but since I almost never check my RSS feeds any more, I rely on Twitter to alert me to new content, and I’m sad I’m going to miss that from you. I guess I could start checking my feeds.

    In the end, you have to do what makes sense for you. Twitter has been such a valuable professional resource for me that I can’t imagine giving it up entirely, but for others like yourself, the ROI just hasn’t been there. I had almost given up Facebook for dead, but then I friended a bunch of people in my new department and it’s been a great way to build relationships — real relationships that play out in Real Life — with them.

    I read Rushkoff’s book recently as well, and while I felt he had wise things to say, I thought he was over-the-top with his warnings. I still think one can manage a life that includes connections to people we know online, rather than choose between programming and being programmed. But — I absolutely respect the decisions of those, like you, who see the need to draw a line. I may be there someday myself.

    I still hope to meet up someday with you, maybe at one of those ASEE meetings we discussed a while back.

    • Thanks for the kind words, Robert. I’ve enjoyed interacting with you as well (and will certainly be keeping up with your blog via RSS). I’ll likely reactivate Twitter sometime post grad school. I also thought about creating a Twitter account to auto-feed blog posts—if I decide to do that I’ll let you know.

      Btw, I also agree Rushkoff goes too far, but nonetheless I’m glad somebody is at least talking about these important issues.

  4. Mitch Paeglow March 9, 2012 at 4:29 pm

    Very well considered & stated!

  5. Matthew Dickerson March 9, 2012 at 8:54 pm

    Very important issues, and well written Ben. I can understand you views and share many of them. Great for you not to let these things erode your potential emotionally, mentally, and spiritually. I believe you and those around you will reap the benefits of you being more unplugged but more in tune with things. Thank you for your thoughts and the example.

  6. Ben, this was a great read. I am torn right now, because my ministry to the students at North Gwinnett High School through Young Life really makes it necessary to be actively involved in social media, as they live out their lives with a good bit of transparency online and I learn things I would not have otherwise, plus I can see trends and hear of events where I can meet up with them (I did that just last night). Interestingly, high schoolers are increasingly using Twitter more than Facebook now, and I’ve gone from never using Twitter to using it constantly in just the past month.

    On the other hand, I do find that desire to check my phone constantly does hinder my home life and yes, even interrupts my driving. I have turned off automatic updates on my phone, but it’s still a gut reaction to check my phone if there is a gap of even a couple of seconds when I’m not doing anything.

    As it stands, I’ll be selling my iPad soon and will likely remove the social media apps and games (especially Words With Friends) from my phone and budget limited time each day to them.

    Thanks for the thought-provoking post.

    • Ryan, thanks for sharing your thoughts here. I do sympathize with your perspective here and suspect that if I do reactivate my social media accounts, it will be for the reasons you find them necessary. I should have included the driving aspect in my post as well—I forgot about it while writing it but do it all the time.

      I did find that deleting the apps from my phone several weeks had a huge ROI. With some firm boundaries in place when on the computer, this would have been manageable if I had a definite need to continue with FB or Twitter (like for ministry, as you say). But in my case, I kept asking myself, why do I still feel the need to check these all the time? so it made little sense to continue.

      Let me know how it goes in the future. I’m still figuring this out for myself.

  7. Wow, this is the best piece I’ve read on the subject, the most compelling arguments for rethinking social media! Thank you, Ben. I’m definitely going to tweet the crap out of this! ;)

  8. I really loved this article. I agree to most of its sections and really liked “In the Future” section :) Cheers Ben!

  9. I have similar concerns. However, I find Facebook extremely useful as an address book precisely because other people update it for me. So I solved the problems I have with it by unsubscribing from everybody in my news feed. I haven’t deleted my photos or previously posted items yet but I think it’s coming.

    I would encourage you to get rid of your smartphone. Why do you need one? Paul Graham doesn’t have one. I don’t even have a cellphone.

    • Chris, good point about the FB address book. I can envision needing someone’s email address or phone # a week from now and wishing my FB account was still active. Time will tell if that drives me back into these environments.

      Re: the smartphone. Perhaps that will be the next layer I peel back. For now I feel there is a lot of practical value I gain from it besides just having the Internet handy (calendar, Kindle app, to-do’s, podcasts). One step at a time.

      Incredible domain name, btw.

  10. I am a student from India. I tried it last year. Completely banned social media, unsubscribed from useless mailing lists. I did it for five months. It removed anxiety in me. I have a lot of time. So I exercised, washed the clothes myself, had enough sleep, completed all the home works in time. That semester I have achieved the highest GPA of my college life. After 5 months, I went back to twitter and facebook, and found myself drawn back. I am not up to date with technology. I would have increased my contacts on a great scale. So, I started using them again. Now am not any more addicted to facebook or twitter, but visit them less frequently 3-4 times a day and even more sometimes, but only after my work is done :)

  11. Its the intrusion part of your blog that could be a whole blog in itself. That was singularly the largest reason why I eventually gave mine up. Its only been three-four weeks and I have felt a huge difference in my mind. I feel cleaner and care less about the affairs that so gripped me in facebook. I see more that I really am not missing out on anything. If giving up fb gives us even a minute of uninterrupted time with the Lord, we have not missed anything!..but instead gained.

  12. For me, restricting access to FB and RSS works quite well. During work hours, I can not access either (thank you, Leechblock). That forces me to focus on interesting stuff when I can and dismiss all else. I also do not own a smart phone; I still have the luxury of going offline.

    I would not want to miss FB (or similar) for the means it offers me to stay loosely connected to old friends and brief aquaintances. I know no other way of effectively and efficiently doing this (with the same quality).

    That said, I am disturbed by the amount of life people pour into social networks. In particular material about others people share; you rightly mention pics of children. Luckily, people over here in Europe/Germany seem to use FB differently, at least in my “friends” group. I think we use it as conventient n-to-m communication device, not as part of our lives.

    I wish you the best of luck for finding your balance!

    You might want to try out Diaspora* or another free social net some time; they have no vested interest in programming you so you can focus on getting what you need.

  13. Facebook and twitter are now a real addiction to many of the youths nowadays. An average youth spends around 3 to 4 hours browsing the social networking sites. what you said is right. these sites are using the people and their time for the purpose of money.

  14. The views about the dark sides of social media are one thing, but the reach these sites give one is another. If debated, this will never be a subject in which one party can win over the other. The right thing to do will be to use these sites in a way that this doesn’t interfere with one’s life. Living online is not necessarily living, but still the idea of social media sites is pretty cool.

Leave a Reply

*

Text formatting is available via select HTML. <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>